John Searle uses both the first-person and third-person point of view to explain that knowledge is in detail. He utilizes ontologies that reveal a lack of interaction between materials entities. He describes them from a third-person point of view to show that human understanding of casualty is in what others perceive (What Things Really Exist). The speaker uses facts and evidence in delivering his message. This rhetorical analysis alludes to the philosophy of language in underscoring existentialism. The first-person point of view allows John Searle to analyze how thinks to exist and delivers his message using audible voice and vocalized pauses. The vocal emphasis helps keep the audience engaged in the subject manner since they follow the volume, pitch, and articulation of the speaker’s ideas. Therefore, John uses facial expressions that combine with articulation to explain that the best way to test a theory rest on the existing understanding.
The speaker’s purpose is to explain that real things exist because people think deeply about what the world is. The speaker has in-depth knowledge about the subject matter ad answers the interview question in a simple language that every audience can understand. John’s facial expressions contribute to the conversation and the subject matter. He maintains eye contact, sits composed, and smiles to exude the overall body language when engaging the interviewer. Therefore, his arms indicate that he is confident about his message on artificial consciousness, which is materialistic. Thus, John chooses worlds suitable for linking ideas and explains how the details trigger the brain’s consciousness. Therefore, a person can study the physical events to trigger conscious experiences in their lives.
The speaker recounts his days as a famous actor to reveal the challenges of an identity crisis. The speech utilizes the first-person point of view, reflecting on the role of an actor and the balance that they need to strike in leaving a harmonious life. The speaker’s purpose is to examine the intricate scene happening when acting. The first-person point of view draws the audience into personalizing what happened to Jim Carrey when he was acting. Therefore, the speaker succeeds in allowing the audience to identify with him instead of dismissing him as an actor who lost the clause. Although Carrey outlines the impact of identity crisis on the depression of a speaker, he invites people using rhetorical analysis to be careful and prevent what happened to him happen to use.
Jim Carrey uses reliable evidence to emphasize his message. Although his ideas are unconventional, the audience is likely to feel that the statements are mere antics of a hopeless actor. However, he dissects the concept of identity in a way that begins with his relation to the act, and the impact of activities goes beyond the screen. Thus, he indicates that the character a person plays stays with them as an actor. This is likely to make you forget about yourself. Therefore, it is easy for a character to lose themselves and live the character they are playing (What Exists under the Surface). The reliability of these facts helps create a mental picture of the question of identity. The realization of who a person is likely to cause concerns.
Jim Carrey utilizes pathos and ethos in his speech. He appeals to both the emotions and the ethical concerns of the audience when he reflects on his experiences and deals with the troubles he went through in returning to himself after finishing the act (). The rhetorical strategies allow Jim Carrey to invoke the feeling of sympathy in the audience when he personalizes his troubles as an actor.
The speaker maintains stances and premises that he makes about identity issues. He supports the stances he makes by illustrating his life as an actor and the extent to which he went is suffering from depression. Thus, the speaker links his ideas using appropriate connectors. The choice of words is effective in making the audience follow his speech. Moreover, Carrey uses a compelling tone to describe how the real-life acting balance.
Roger Penrose provides content about mathematical inventory and innovation that is engaging and useful. The speaker uses the first-person point of view to discuss reductionists, mathematics, and quantum mechanism. He also delves into Plato, truth, beauty, and goodness. The goal is to engage in a scientific conversation that alludes to impossible triangles. Therefore, the audience follows his contributions to scientific relativity.
Penrose provides evidence and fact that are reliable. The examples that emerge in the conversation explain the aspects of science and mathematics and the relationship that exists between general relativity and quantum mechanics (What Things Really Exist). Thus, Penrose proposes that there are certain mysteries about consciousness and existences.
The speaker uses the rhetorical strategy of pathos to appeal to knowledge. He ensures that the audience can look at science and mathematics in a manner that helps them understand the abstract world, the physical world, and the conscious world. Thus, these bridges all forms of the world. Consciousness helps the audience see the world in abstract ways, thereby reifying them in the physical world.
The speaker links ideas using simple language. The intellectual dilemma occurs when he alludes to the timelessness or the beginning of time. Therefore, the choice of language is suitable for the general audience to follow the comprehensive understanding of concepts of existence and illusion. He smiles, maintains eye contact, and pauses to allow the audience to digest his revelation and understand the concepts he is talking about. The speaker utilizes pauses and emphasis to relevant the role of quantum mechanics in explaining the world. All of these are relevant in the tonal variation to help talk about the role of mathematics in depicting the world and other internal phenomena. Through pathos, Penrose helps demystify the mystery around mathematics. Given that such mystery comes from the artificial distinction people make about quantity and quality, there is a need for distinction. However, this distinction does not exist in the real world.
Carrey, Jim. “What Really Exists under the Surface.” YouTube, uploaded by The Journey of Purpose TJOP, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TucyzpHDNlE
Penrose, Roger. “What Things Really Exist.” YouTube, uploaded by Closer To Truth, 25 July 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9Q6SWcTA9w
Searle, John. “What Things Really Exist?.” YouTube, uploaded by Closer To Truth, 6, Mar 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAUaP1IcZUc