Advanced english | Article writing homework help

  

Instructions
For this assignment, complete the following:

Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and/or your peers.

Compose a position paper representing the pro side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs: 

Introduction (with thesis statement)

Context paragraph

3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 pros)

Conclusion

Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view – no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clichés, and slang terminology.

Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and headers.

Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.

Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)

1-inch margins

Double spaced

12-point Times New Roman font

Title page

References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)

Grading
This activity will be graded using the Pro-Position Paper Grading Rubric. 

Week 2 Assignment: Pro-Position Paper

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 125
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 3; pp. 100-107
  • Lesson
  • Week 1 Assignment
  • Link (Word doc): Pro-Paper TemplatePreview the document
  • Minimum of 3 academic articles (from the Week 1 Assignment)

Apply the following writing resources to your posts:

Instructions

For this assignment, complete the following:

  • Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and/or your peers.
  • Compose a position paper representing the pro side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:
    • Introduction (with thesis statement)
    • Context paragraph
    • 3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 pros)
    • Conclusion
  • Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view – no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clichés, and slang terminology.
  • Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and headers.
  • Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.
  • Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Pro-Position Paper Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Position Paper Grading Rubric – 125 pts (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Length

5.0 pts

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Point Analysis

30.0 pts

The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought.

25.5 pts

The central idea is discernible and developed.

22.5 pts

The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis.

18.0 pts

The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought.

0.0 pts

No effort

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Support

30.0 pts

The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasive examples.

25.5 pts

The writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument.

22.5 pts

The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-developed or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive.

18.0 pts

The central idea is not well-supported by claims and/or examples.

0.0 pts

No effort

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization

25.0 pts

Paper is clear and cohesive. Introduction and conclusion support the overall flow of the paper.

21.25 pts

Paper is basically clear and well-organized with a minimum of non-related material present.

18.75 pts

Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organization.

15.0 pts

Paper lacks organization and has difficulty staying on track. Central themes are difficult to identify.

0.0 pts

No effort

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Writing: Mechanics & Usage

10.0 pts

The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.

8.5 pts

The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.

7.5 pts

The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.

6.0 pts

The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clarity & Flow

10.0 pts

The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety aids with the flow of ideas.

8.5 pts

The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas.

7.5 pts

The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas.

6.0 pts

The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Voice

5.0 pts

The writing maintains third-person point of view/objective voice throughout the entire text.

4.25 pts

The writing maintains third-person point of view/objective voice throughout much of the text.

3.75 pts

The writing has some deviation from third-person point of view/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.

3.0 pts

The writing deviates significantly from third-person point of view/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.

0.0 pts

No effort

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA Format

10.0 pts

All sources are properly integrated and cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of integrating resources and APA format.

8.5 pts

Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in integration and/or citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information.

7.5 pts

Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in integration and/or citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information.

6.0 pts

Sources are not properly integrated/cited in the text/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of the integration of resources and APA format.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

Total Points: 125.0

Previous 

Week 2 Assignment: Pro-Position Paper

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 125
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 3; pp. 100-107
  • Lesson
  • Week 1 Assignment
  • Link (Word doc): Pro-Paper TemplatePreview the document
  • Minimum of 3 academic articles (from the Week 1 Assignment)

Apply the following writing resources to your posts:

Instructions

For this assignment, complete the following:

  • Review the Toulmin-model outline (Week 2 Lesson) and your completed Week 1 Assignment (Pro-Position Proposal). Assess any feedback provided by the professor and/or your peers.
  • Compose a position paper representing the pro side of your topic. (See the Pro-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:
    • Introduction (with thesis statement)
    • Context paragraph
    • 3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 pros)
    • Conclusion
  • Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view – no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clichés, and slang terminology.
  • Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and headers.
  • Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.
  • Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Pro-Position Paper Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Position Paper Grading Rubric – 125 pts (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Length

5.0 pts

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Point Analysis

30.0 pts

The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought.

25.5 pts

The central idea is discernible and developed.

22.5 pts

The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis.

18.0 pts

The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought.

0.0 pts

No effort

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Support

30.0 pts

The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasive examples.

25.5 pts

The writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument.

22.5 pts

The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-developed or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive.

18.0 pts

The central idea is not well-supported by claims and/or examples.

0.0 pts

No effort

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization

25.0 pts

Paper is clear and cohesive. Introduction and conclusion support the overall flow of the paper.

21.25 pts

Paper is basically clear and well-organized with a minimum of non-related material present.

18.75 pts

Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organization.

15.0 pts

Paper lacks organization and has difficulty staying on track. Central themes are difficult to identify.

0.0 pts

No effort

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Writing: Mechanics & Usage

10.0 pts

The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.

8.5 pts

The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.

7.5 pts

The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.

6.0 pts

The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Clarity & Flow

10.0 pts

The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety aids with the flow of ideas.

8.5 pts

The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas.

7.5 pts

The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas.

6.0 pts

The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Voice

5.0 pts

The writing maintains third-person point of view/objective voice throughout the entire text.

4.25 pts

The writing maintains third-person point of view/objective voice throughout much of the text.

3.75 pts

The writing has some deviation from third-person point of view/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.

3.0 pts

The writing deviates significantly from third-person point of view/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing.

0.0 pts

No effort

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA Format

10.0 pts

All sources are properly integrated and cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of integrating resources and APA format.

8.5 pts

Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in integration and/or citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information.

7.5 pts

Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in integration and/or citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information.

6.0 pts

Sources are not properly integrated/cited in the text/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of the integration of resources and APA format.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

Total Points: 125.0

PreviousNext

Premium Custom Essays
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.